Miniscule experience of IT profession has realised me something about organisations. That is, In my thinking, "At inception, a particular organisation is all by individual or personnel to meet the business objectives, as time progresses this gradually shifts to processes (system model) as organisation matures".
Its good. Works for IT, afterall business should not depend on individual or personnel to yield results(profit). Also, during the course of maturity the optimistic individuals who conceived idea to see business opportunity will have moved up the ladder. Classic trajectory. Check out history of a successful company you are more likely to find the course is identical. To be able to realise better productivity and minimise costs everyone should participate. At the least the top management should invest more efforts in installing fool proof system model to define and institutionalise processes out of any experience gained. Other day, I was interviewing a candidate for Project Manager role. During the brief chat, candidate continuously referred to the processes, tools and the system model (by saying 'thats how it works') but basically lacked WHYs that was of my prime interest. Classic example of PM in services industry that is level 5 certified and he did work for one. The problem with not knowing rationale is one looses way easily and value addition plummetes below nil.
Interesting enough during late 90's and early 2000 most of start-up IT companies hurried to be certified CMM level 5 as soon as possible. Driver was US market and to be in the slot to bid for bigger and revenue generating projects (also anything and everything that fetches $80/hour). Start-ups where 90% of employees are relatively fresh graduates or just about 2-5 years of experience what maturity could be exhibitted in skills, operations or challenges they need take up!
Honestly, I think its wrong, shouldnt maturity be yielded... can you force it? its like aging quicker and faster, if that's happening you are challenging nature and probably nearly God. Companies which only certified level 5 had their time but eventualy dissolved with biggies and that's another story. But to regard something as good as an ideal company we need value based systems in place where individuals add value continuously and processes reassure the yields. That level is when challenges can become routine and innovation is inevitable. Excellence will be virtue; companies do not need SEI certifications.
By the way I work for a small company that does not believe in certifications but understands basics well enough (read as innovates) and been able to make some money (well quantum is subject matter).

